| uncle jed | |
|
+7bethandmanly jessicamarie littlehouselover Gin Shell ChristineLovesLHOTP Krissy 11 posters |
Author | Message |
---|
Krissy Ingalls Friend for Life
Number of posts : 45733 Location : Ontario, Canada Mood :
| Subject: uncle jed Wed Dec 28, 2011 11:32 pm | |
| James & cassandra's uncle comes for the children asking for custody. “Tomorrow is a new day with no mistakes in it... Yet.” ― L.M. Montgomery, Anne of Green Gables | |
|
| |
Krissy Ingalls Friend for Life
Number of posts : 45733 Location : Ontario, Canada Mood :
| Subject: Re: uncle jed Thu Dec 29, 2011 8:29 pm | |
| This one was okay. I think it was wrong of the childrens uncle to try and take them away when they descided to say theire. I do understand that he want to be with them.He has ever right to do so.Glad to have had a happy ending. “Tomorrow is a new day with no mistakes in it... Yet.” ― L.M. Montgomery, Anne of Green Gables | |
|
| |
ChristineLovesLHOTP New Pioneer
Number of posts : 227 Location : Western Massachusetts Mood :
| Subject: Re: uncle jed Sat Mar 03, 2012 12:01 am | |
| I did not care for this one........Not a fan of james and cassandra episodes “I am beginning to learn that it is the sweet, simple things of life which are the real ones after all.” ― Laura Ingalls Wilder | |
|
| |
Shell Farm Land Owner
Number of posts : 1353 Location : Indiana Mood :
| Subject: Re: uncle jed Thu Mar 08, 2012 5:02 pm | |
| Jed shouldn't have tried to take James&Cassandra away after they decided they wanted to stay with the Ingalls family. He told Charles&Caroline to let the kids decide and then he was mad and threatened to take them to court to get custody when Charles told him James&Cassandra wanted to stay with him and Caroline. I feel Jed was trying to bribe them into going with him by promising them he would buy them anything they wanted. | |
|
| |
Krissy Ingalls Friend for Life
Number of posts : 45733 Location : Ontario, Canada Mood :
| Subject: Re: uncle jed Thu Mar 08, 2012 5:45 pm | |
| - Spanky wrote:
- Jed shouldn't have tried to take James&Cassandra away after they decided they wanted to stay with the Ingalls family. He told Charles&Caroline to let the kids decide and then he was mad and threatened to take them to court to get custody when Charles told him James&Cassandra wanted to stay with him and Caroline. I feel Jed was trying to bribe them into going with him by promising them he would buy them anything they wanted.
I agree “Tomorrow is a new day with no mistakes in it... Yet.” ― L.M. Montgomery, Anne of Green Gables | |
|
| |
Gin Ingalls Friend for Life
Number of posts : 5920 Location : Curled up with a great book. Mood :
| Subject: Re: uncle jed Thu Mar 08, 2012 8:17 pm | |
| You must be watching these on the Hallmark channel. I've watched the same ones for the past week.
It would have been neat to see Jed just want to settle down in Walnut Grove and play an active roll in the town and the childrens lives. He was up in years so it didnt make sense for him to raise young children even though he had money to do it.
Poor kids...they really had bonded with the WHOLE Ingalls family. I'm odd but I like these episodes....I think they were well written. It is the lack of Christianity that has brought us where we are. Not a lack of churches or religious forms but of the real thing in our hearts. LIW.....Words From a Fearless Heart | |
|
| |
Shell Farm Land Owner
Number of posts : 1353 Location : Indiana Mood :
| Subject: Re: uncle jed Thu Mar 08, 2012 8:40 pm | |
| I watch it once in a while on Hallmark. I mostly watch the DVDs. I am currently on season 1. I decided to have a marathon and watch my favorite episodes from each season. Season 9 is my least favorite season. | |
|
| |
Krissy Ingalls Friend for Life
Number of posts : 45733 Location : Ontario, Canada Mood :
| Subject: Re: uncle jed Thu Mar 08, 2012 8:43 pm | |
| - Gin wrote:
- You must be watching these on the Hallmark channel. I've watched the same ones for the past week.
It would have been neat to see Jed just want to settle down in Walnut Grove and play an active roll in the town and the childrens lives. He was up in years so it didnt make sense for him to raise young children even though he had money to do it.
Poor kids...they really had bonded with the WHOLE Ingalls family. I'm odd but I like these episodes....I think they were well written. Now that be cool - Spanky wrote:
- I watch it once in a while on Hallmark. I mostly watch the DVDs. I am currently on season 1. I decided to have a marathon and watch my favorite episodes from each season. Season 9 is my least favorite season.
awesome idea “Tomorrow is a new day with no mistakes in it... Yet.” ― L.M. Montgomery, Anne of Green Gables | |
|
| |
littlehouselover Walnut Grove Resident
Number of posts : 1064
| Subject: Re: uncle jed Tue Jul 17, 2012 6:07 am | |
| I thought if he couldn't live there, (Walnut Grove isn't for everyone) it would have been nice, with all his money, to leave them some, to give some to Charles and Caroline to raise them. Did I miss something with that? It wouldn't have been charity, he was related and going to pass on soon. | |
|
| |
jessicamarie New Pioneer
Number of posts : 142 Location : Oregon Mood :
| Subject: Re: uncle jed Wed Oct 03, 2012 9:33 am | |
| He probably left a lot of it to James and Cassandra on his will. | |
|
| |
bethandmanly Dean's Dedicated Diva
Number of posts : 7600 Location : In a book Mood :
| Subject: Re: uncle jed Wed Oct 03, 2012 9:59 am | |
| - jessicamarie wrote:
- He probably left a lot of it to James and Cassandra on his will.
Then why were the Ingalls struggling to raise them so much that they moved to Burr Oak, IA? I had forgotten about this episode--or at least that the possibility that Uncle Jed left the Cooper children his money. It then makes no sense that Charles had to move the family away. In fact, they would probably have been the second wealthiest family in WG if that happened. | |
|
| |
jessicamarie New Pioneer
Number of posts : 142 Location : Oregon Mood :
| Subject: Re: uncle jed Wed Oct 03, 2012 10:05 am | |
| Maybe Jed hadn't died yet? Idk, there are a lot of goofs like that on the writers part. Overall it was a good show, but they had there inconsistencies. | |
|
| |
Savannah "Psalm 34"
Number of posts : 54431 Mood :
| Subject: Re: uncle jed Wed Oct 03, 2012 10:48 am | |
| - bethandmanly wrote:
- jessicamarie wrote:
- He probably left a lot of it to James and Cassandra on his will.
Then why were the Ingalls struggling to raise them so much that they moved to Burr Oak, IA? I had forgotten about this episode--or at least that the possibility that Uncle Jed left the Cooper children his money. It then makes no sense that Charles had to move the family away. In fact, they would probably have been the second wealthiest family in WG if that happened. It may have been left to them in trust, and not been accessible until they turned a certain age. | |
|
| |
LHOTPfan2000 Prairie Settler
Number of posts : 675 Location : Uk Mood :
| Subject: Re: uncle jed Mon Jun 10, 2013 9:08 am | |
| This was a good one! “It was a huge shock when it came and very excited“ This was the duchess of cambridges take on how she felt when William proposed during their official engagement interview with ITN reporter Tom Bradby. There was a real giggle at the end. Cute. | |
|
| |
LauraIngallsfan "Psalm 73"
Number of posts : 9265 Location : South Dakota Mood :
| |
| |
amyk Frontier Traveler
Number of posts : 558
| Subject: Re: uncle jed Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:32 pm | |
| I did not love this episode, but at least Uncle Jed (reminds me of THE BEVERLY HILLBILLIES!) did what was right at the end. He could have insisted that James and Cassandra move with him all the way to California. And at least Carrie got some lines in this episode.
Probably one of the reasons I don't love this episode is that I never was really able to accept the adoption of James and Cassandra into the Ingalls family. I think I have resentment because Cassandra became the main Ingalls female child to be featured (in my opinion), and I think that should have gone to Carrie. | |
|
| |
amyk Frontier Traveler
Number of posts : 558
| Subject: Re: uncle jed Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:35 pm | |
| - Gin wrote:
- You must be watching these on the Hallmark channel. I've watched the same ones for the past week.
It would have been neat to see Jed just want to settle down in Walnut Grove and play an active roll in the town and the childrens lives. He was up in years so it didnt make sense for him to raise young children even though he had money to do it.
Poor kids...they really had bonded with the WHOLE Ingalls family. I'm odd but I like these episodes....I think they were well written. I also think it would have been great if he just settled down in Walnut Grove, except of course for the "consumption" issue....also, I thought that the judge should have considered his age. Even without "consumption," would he really live long enough until James and Cassandra would be on their own? I also wonder if he left his money to them when he died... Seems like Uncle Jed could have offered ongoing provision of money for the children, but I don't know that Charles would be able to accept that. But if only he had and then been able to stay in Walnut Grove, that would have been far better for the family, especially for Albert.
Last edited by amyk on Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:38 pm; edited 1 time in total | |
|
| |
amyk Frontier Traveler
Number of posts : 558
| Subject: Re: uncle jed Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:37 pm | |
| - LauraIngallsfan wrote:
- Great episode! I started out liking Jed, but as soon as he began talking about how he wanted to have the custody of James and Cassandra I started to not like him as much. After they made their choice to stay with the Ingalls, and he said he was going to court against them, I really began to dislike him! I must say I was shocked at what he was saying.... I never would have thought that he would go that far! He only wanted them for his own selfish reasons, he never thought about what was best for the children. I am glad everything worked out in the end, and James and Cassandra got to stay with the Ingalls. James and Cassandra understood that money couldn't buy happiness!
I thought that Charles was wrong to tell the judge he had no argument with that lawyer when the lawyer seemed to be indicating that Jed's decision to fight for custody was solely based on what was best for the children. It wasn't based on that....he said himself that HE wanted the children, even when he knew they didn't want him (not if the price was giving up the family they had become a part of). | |
|
| |
amyk Frontier Traveler
Number of posts : 558
| Subject: Re: uncle jed Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:39 pm | |
| - Savannah wrote:
- bethandmanly wrote:
- jessicamarie wrote:
- He probably left a lot of it to James and Cassandra on his will.
Then why were the Ingalls struggling to raise them so much that they moved to Burr Oak, IA? I had forgotten about this episode--or at least that the possibility that Uncle Jed left the Cooper children his money. It then makes no sense that Charles had to move the family away. In fact, they would probably have been the second wealthiest family in WG if that happened. It may have been left to them in trust, and not been accessible until they turned a certain age. That would make sense....maybe it provided for them to even get to go to college someday (or at least James, as I'm not sure that many women were going to college yet at that time). | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: uncle jed | |
| |
|
| |
| uncle jed | |
|